Monday, June 20, 2016

BC-CCSGI News: Unite and Donate for Justice - Voters Deserve a True and Impartial Ballot Question

NOTE: BetterCupertino is the grassroots citizens' group that submitted Cupertino Citizens' Sensible Growth Initiative. The Cupertino Citizens' for Sensible Zoning Action Committee is a committee under BetterCupertino.


Cupertino Voters Deserve a True and Impartial Ballot Question, Not Influenced by Profit-Driven Developers



Topics: (scroll down for details)
>> Donate to CCSG Initiative for Justice. 48-hour Fund Drive for Legal Fund. End 6pm Wednesday June 22.
>> Writ of Mandate Filed to Remove Deceptive Ballot Language Inserted under the influence of developers and their lobbyists.
>> Oaks Initiative Will Aim for Special Election, to be Paid by Taxpayers.
>> Take the City's Survey on Parks, Open Space and Recreations Master Plan by July 15.
>> Projects to be Approved: Marina Plaza and Hamptons.
>> Projects Under Construction: Hyatt House Hotel, Main Street and Apple Campus 2.

Grassroots Citizens Unite. Donate to CCSG Initiative to Save Cupertino from Uncontrolled Growth.

>> Donate to CCSG Initiative for Justice. 48-hour Fund Drive for Legal Fund.

Two generous anonymous donors have stepped up to match any donation of over $150 for up to $4,000 within a 48-hour period to help reach the target of $50,000 Legal Fund. The clock will start running from Monday June 20 at 6pm to Wednesday June 22 at 6pm. The recommended donation per household is $200. The price of two family meals to help compel the City Council to comply with Election Code to provide the voters "true and impartial" ballot question, "not likely to prejudice" voters.

Without a fair vote for CCSG Initiative in November election, Cupertino will be put back on the path of hypergrowth, where three votes of the City Council can approve ultra-high density projects like Sand Hill's massive office park at Vallco. Even if the voters refuse the Vallco Initiative at the ballot, the City Council can still approve a slightly reduced version, despite of strong opposition.




>> Writ of Mandate Filed to Remove Deceptive Ballot Language Inserted under the influence of developers and their lobbyists.

The CCSG Initiative gives the voters a choice between hypergrowth, favored by the City Council with heavy influence by developers, and sensible growth, where new projects follow a long-term plan. But, the CCSG Initiative is in grave danger because the City Council, under pressure by developers (by a bare 3-2 margin), adopted deceptive language for the November ballot question, based on false interpretation of the initiative and Cupertino's General Plan. CCSG Initiative maintains existing building heights in all areas, including Neighborhoods (30 feet). But the ballot question falsely states that CCSG Initiative will increase building heights in the Neighborhoods to 45 feet, as requested by attorneys representing Sand Hill. Keep in mind that most voters will only read the ballot question, and will use it to decide whether to vote for or against the CCSG Initiative. That’s how critical the ballot question is.

On Monday June 13th the CCSG Initiative Committee filed a Writ of Mandate at the Santa Clara County courthouse to order the City to correct its ballot label. The lawsuit is expected to cost about $50,000. The CCSG Initiative has put in $15,000 and we need your help for the remaining fund. This is the time for grassroots citizens to band together and pitch in to protect our city and to assert justice for the citizens. Lack of action or involvement today will result in higher living expenses with worsen quality of life under unplanned developer-driven hypergrowth.
Cupertino Voters Deserve a True and Impartial Ballot Question of CCSG Initiative in order to exercise their rights of democracy.


>> Oaks Initiative Will Aim for Special Election, to be Paid by Taxpayers.

KT Urban, the developer behind the Initiative to redevelop Oaks Shopping Center into high density mixed use project, has announced that the Oaks Initiative won't be put in November election. KT Urban will continue to collect signatures to aim for a special election costing about $500,000-$1,000,000, to be paid by the taxpayers. Every signature to "just put it on the ballot" is a signature to agree to fund an election for the developer's project while skipping a developer-paid environmental impact review.

>> Take the City's Survey on Parks, Open Space and Recreations Master Plan by July 15.


The Master Plan is a long-term plan (till year 2040) to implement policies adopted in Dec. 2014. BetterCupertino recommends the following:
  • Request ground-level parkland for large development, preferably onsite of the development project.
  • Request that the priority be put in purchasing more parkland in areas with insufficient parks or access to parks, instead of allowing developers to pay for parkland mitigation.
  • Request that the existing parkland is preserved in size and not get reduced for other purposes like parking.
  • No rooftop park should be counted towards parkland requirement.
  • Large development projects should provide parkland instead of parkland mitigation fee.
  • Parkland mitigation fees from development projects should be applied to the area impacted most by the projects.
  • Consider 1.5% annual population growth per year when all projects follow the General Plan. Cupertino will face almost 40% increase in population in 25 years. What's needed in the park master plan to cope with that population growth? If massive development projects like Vallco and Oaks get approved, how could the park master plan cope with the accelerat

>> Projects to be Approved: Marina Plaza and Hamptons

  • Marina Plaza at the northwest corner of De Anza and Stevens Creek - June 28 at Planning Commission. July 5 at City Council Meeting. Replace 44,000 square feet of retail space by 23,000 square feet of retail space, 122 room hotel,188 residential units, including 16 below market rate units. 45 feet tall.
  • Hamptons Project at the northeast corner of Wolfe and 280 - May 10 at Planning Commission. June 6 at City Council Meeting. Replace 342 apartments by 942 apartments at 75 feet tall. ZERO affordable housing.

>> Projects Under Construction: Hyatt House Hotel, Main Street, Apple Campus 2.
  • Hyatt House (KCR) HotelAlready approved. 148 room, 5 story hotel. A full service 2,500 square-foot restaurant, 2,160 square-foot meeting room, and 320 square-foot boardroom.
  • Main Street: Under construction. 120-unit market rate apartment. ZERO affordable housing. 180 room hotel. 295,000 square feet of office space (but only 260,000 allocated). 1.55 acre town square and park.
  • Apple Campus 2: Under construction. 175 acre area. 2.8 million square feet of office space. A 1,000 seat auditorium, research facility of 600,000 square feet, fitness center and central plant.

>> Latest Blogs:


Home Page: BetterCupertino.org and CCSensibleGrowth.org
Paid for by Committee supporting Cupertino Citizens' Sensible Growth Initiative, PO Box 1132, Cupertino, CA 95015, FPPC# 1381645.

Stand Together for a Better Cupertino. Protect Our Quality of Life. We Live Here.


Thursday, June 2, 2016

BC-CCSGI News: Survey, Information Meeting, Donation

NOTE: BetterCupertino is the grassroots citizens' group that submitted Cupertino Citizens' Sensible Growth Initiative. The Cupertino Citizens' for Sensible Zoning Action Committee is a committee under BetterCupertino. Read more about BetterCupertino and what they've done in the nomination paper of CREST Award.

Protect Cupertino from the Exploitation of Profit-Driven Developers and their misinformation Campaign.

Topics: (scroll down for details)
>> Sunday Information Meeting on Development Issues by BetterCupertino.
>> Take Survey for Vallco Initiative by June 8 - Please forward to anyone.
>> Monday June 6 - Council meeting where Vallco Initiative could be adopted as is!
>> Report Circulators with questionable behavior to Secretary of State since Vallco Initiative only got 473 more than required signatures.
>> Sand Hill's flyers says "We Could Be Surrounded by 4-story Houses." Total Fabrication!
>> Donate to Help the "Little People" Fight Against the Smear Campaign by "the Powerful and Resourceful"!

Stand Together for a Better Cupertino. Protect Our Quality of Life. We Live Here.

>> Sunday Information Meeting on Development Issues by BetterCupertino
How could Cupertino evolve gracefully? How to balance our quality of life with economic growth? Why the initiatives in November election will determine the future of Cupertino? Why you should pay attention since the consequence of no action may not be what you would expect.
Time: Sunday June 5 and 19, 2-4pm
Location: O'mei Academy, 10070 Imperial Ave, Cupertino (across from Post Office, first street west of Bubb.)

>> Take Survey for Vallco Initiative by June 8 - Please forward to anyone.
Vallco Town Center initiative sponsored by SandHill has collected enough signatures. The city could choose to adopt the initiative as is or put it on the ballot for Nov. election. Developers are very likely lobbying the city council to adopt the initiative right away without election. Please take one minute to take the simple 4-question survey and comment to voice your opinion. Better Cupertino will present the result to the city council.
Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/TJSDCTJ Real time survey results:  http://tiny.cc/bc-survey-vallco-result

>> Attend Monday June 6 Council meeting where Vallco Initiative could be adopted as is!
Sand Hill's Vallco office park Initiative collected 3,679 signature, but only 79.1% or 2,912 were valid signatures. Only 11.7% of the 24,753 registered voters. On Monday June 6, the City Council has the option to adopt the Vallco office park Initiative even without waiting for 9212 Report.

In comparison, CCSG Initiative collected 4,204 signatures and 89.4% or 3,759 signatures were valid. The volunteer team of circulators for CCSG Initiative collected almost 30% more valid signatures than Vallco Initiative. 

The Vallco Initiative only collected 473 signatures more than the 10% required. If you have signed the Vallco Initiative because you were misled by the circulators, it is important that you report your encounters to California Secretary of State: http://www.bettercupertino.org/#!report-violation/lj9m4.


>> Sand Hill's flyers says "We Could Be Surrounded by 4-story Houses." Total Fabrication!

15-year old Charlie "could" drink alcohol today, but the likelihood of him drinking any alcohol is zilch since he is not legally allowed to drink and Charlie knows to follow the law.

Your neighbor "could" build a 4-story house today (regardless of whether CCSG Initiative is adopted), but it is unlikely since it is not allowed under the zoning code and the City Council most likely would ask your neighbor to follow the law. The adoption of CCSG Initiative doesn't make it any more likely to build 4-story house.

The building height, setbacks and other design parameters are limited by the Zoning Code in various zones, including residential neighborhoods. No one can build 4-story houses today since the Zoning Code only allows 2-story buildings for residential neighborhoods. Therefore, Sand Hill's claim is a fabrication.

Sand Hill's flyers never told the truth about the Hills at Vallco. Sand Hill's flyers now fabricate lies about CCSG Initiative. It is up to the educated voters of Cupertino to see through the smear campaign and see the truth.
Why does the City Council and developers fight so hard against CCSG Initiative? Is it because CCSG Initiative would protect Cupertino from exploitation of profit-driven developers and the Councilmembers who are heavily influenced by them?

>> Donate to Help "little people" fight against the smear campaign by "the powerful and resourceful".
Sand Hill actively manipulated the City Council to railroad CCSG Initiative with the deceptive ballot question meant to prejudice the voters. CCSG Inititave Maintains Existing Building Heights, incl. Neighborhoods (30 feet). There is no ambiguity. 

The transformation of the Ballot Question from Law-biding to Prejudicial - Maneuvers of Developer through the City Council - is a manifestation of the alarming problem in Cupertino and the troublesome problem of representative democracy. Read this blog to see how the City Council is influenced by Sand Hill's attorneys.
http://bettercupertino.blogspot.com/2016/05/transformation-ballot-question-maneuvers.html

Donate to help us, the "little people", to fight against the smear campaign of Sand Hill to show the voters the truth. Donate the amount of your last family meal in a restaurant and you've taken one significant step in helping to protect Cupertino. 

Home Page: BetterCupertino.org and CCSensibleGrowth.org
Paid for by Committee supporting Cupertino Citizens' Sensible Growth Initiative, PO Box 1132, Cupertino, CA 95015, FPPC# 1381645.